翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Cracked ・ Cracked (Canadian TV series) ・ Cracked (magazine) ・ Cracked (Scottish TV series) ・ Cracked Actor ・ Cracked Actor (song) ・ Cracked Brain ・ Cracked Eggs and Noodles ・ Cracked Ice ・ Cracked Mirror Publishing ・ Cracked Nuts ・ Cracked Quack ・ Cracked Rear View ・ Cracked Tiles ・ Cracked tooth syndrome ・ Crabb v Arun DC ・ Crabb, Texas ・ Crabbe ・ Crabbe Mill, Virginia ・ Crabbe Mountain ・ Crabbet Arabian Stud ・ Crabbie's ・ Crabbit Old Woman ・ Crabble Athletic Ground ・ Crabbs Cross ・ Crabbuckit ・ Crabby Appleton ・ Crabby Joe's Tap & Grill ・ Crabchurch Conspiracy ・ Crabeater Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Crabb v Arun DC ： ウィキペディア英語版 Crabb v Arun DC ''Crabb v Arun District Council'' () (EWCA Civ 7 ) is a leading English land law and contract case concerning "proprietary estoppel". Lord Denning MR affirmed that where agreements concern the acquisition of rights over land, there is no need for both parties to provide a consideration for upholding the bargain. While promissory estoppel cannot found a cause of action it was held that in the peculiar situation of land, consideration is not necessary at all. ==Facts== In 1965 Mr Victor Crabb bought two acres of land in the sea-side village of Pagham, near Bognor Regis. His neighbours on three and a half acres to the west were Arun District Council (ADC) (formerly Chichester Rural District Council). The north part of land owned by Crabb faced Hook Lane, and the West side was Mill Park Road, which also the east side of the ADC's land. There were two access points to Mill Park Road, which led up to Hook Lane, and out of the village, point "A" and point "B". The access point "A" was open by virtue of a formalised easement, granted when the previous owner of the whole five and a half acres had sold the property on to ADC and Crabb, Access point "B" was open only because the council was letting Crabb use it, with no formal written agreement in place. In February 1968 ADC put up gates at point "A" and "B". Crabb believing that he had assurances to use both gates, sold off the northern half of the land, where access point "A" was. For the southern half of the land, he relied on having access point "B" open. In January 1969 Crabb secured the inside of the gate at point "B" with padlocks. ADC responded by removing the gates and replacing it with a fence. Crabb asked for to access point to be re-opened. ADC said they would in return for £3000. Crabb subsequently sued the council, alleging that he had been given an assurance that the gates would remain open. The trial judge found that Crabb had received no formal or firm assurance, but more importantly, if there was, Crabb had given no consideration in return for it, and it was not enforceable. Crabb subsequently appealed the decision. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Crabb v Arun DC」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.